I see dead people.
This is, of course, the memorable line from the hit move The Sixth Sense.
Well, I do not see dead people. But, like the boy in Sixth Sense, it seems that I see quite differently than most people when it comes to, not dead people, but old houses. Houses which I think are treasures beyond compare — and should be snapped up, exquisitely restored, and cherished — MOST people pay no attention to. The qualities which I see, others do not.
I just don’t get it. Or, perhaps, I simply have really bad taste in houses.
The house at 702 West Street, Emporia, is just such an example. It has languished on the market, and with its price dropping and dropping. It begs: Please buy me! Please!
The house is not large, and it is not, admittedly, much of an eye-catcher from the outside. Although it could be.
It does sit on a large corner lot, has some lovely trees, and is surrounded by attractive housing.
The current price ($40K) seems a steal to me.
Yet it sits, unloved and unwanted. My reaction? I salivate, I experience lust, and my mind races with restoration and renovation ideas.
What first attracted my special attention was the possibility that the house was designed by noted architect Charles W. Squires, who designed my Cross House, and many other wonderful houses/buildings in Emporia and Kansas.
Well, what could be better? I mean, this alone is a reason to cherish the house!
ABOVE: 702 West Street. It is not readily obvious in the images but the first-floor corner is a round bay.
ABOVE: See the asphalt shingles on the porch roof? They should curve around the corner, and not be laid in pie-shaped sections.
ABOVE: The delicious rounded bay.
ABOVE: The north exterior. THIS is what captured my special attention, and THIS is why Charles Squires must be the architect. Why? Well, this is a really odd facade. Most architects would have simply had the upper, extended section go in a straight line down to foundation. I mean, this is not the main facade, and you really cannot even see this wall (a house is right next door). But the architect of 702 decided to have some fun, so he/she brought one section down with a sensuous curve, and then the adjacent section down into a window bay with an angled bottom. This was not an expensive house yet these two details cost money. But they are cool. And most people, sigh, will never notice all this effort.
ABOVE: Between the sensuous bay and the other bay there is this, ah, indent. This indent was a lot of extra work. But it is cool.
ABOVE: The south facade. That is the lovely Lacie showing the house to the charming Brandon.
ABOVE: Note just above the window on the first-floor bay, and directly above each second-floor window. See the horizontal blocks of wood? That is a exaggerated dentil detail, and Squires loved this detail.
ABOVE: You can see another exaggerated dentil detail on a confirmed Squires design at 819 Constitution, shown in this thread.
ABOVE: More dentil at 702.
ABOVE: The front porch at 702 has not one but two sweeping rounded corners. Whoee!
ABOVE: The porch columns appear original; the balustrade does not.
ABOVE: Nice original hardware on the front door.
ABOVE: Because 702 was not an expensive house, the staircase is simple. But it is nice.
ABOVE: The ball at the top is really huge and fun to grab. Note the chamfered corners, which decrease in width as they reach the floor.
ABOVE: The newel post at 819 Constitution, a confirmed Squires design. Note the same kind of over-scaled finial as in 702, and the same angled chamfered corners.
ABOVE: Living room. Even though the rounded bay is obvious outside, one is nonetheless surprised to find a lovely, delicious bay inside. It is wonderful in person. I do love a dramatic sweep.
ABOVE: The lighting appears to be original and is a knock-out. I am SO afraid that a buyer will think nothing of putting this fixture, and others (below) out in a yard sale. Oh, the shades are not original. The upper section of the fixture would have been gas, and the lower section electric.
ABOVE: The second living room. My heart aches at the thought of what the ceiling fan replaced.
ABOVE: The second living room. The dining room is to the left, and through non-original (and reduced in height) French doors.
ABOVE: The mantle, like the stair, is simple yet sweet. The brick is not original, and it appears that there was once an over-mantle.
ABOVE: Dining room. The flooring is not original.
ABOVE: Dining room. The bay.
ABOVE: Dining room. Soooooooooooooooo beautiful. Geez.
ABOVE: The kitchen. I like the cabinets.
ABOVE: There are three bedrooms upstairs. This is the natural master bedroom, and we are looking at a sweet alcove which had closets built in at some point. Sweet it may be, but I would remove the closets and convert the alcove to a bathroom (as every master bedroom should have an en-suite bath, right?).
ABOVE: Bedroom #2. Not a bad size in person.
ABOVE: Bedroom #3. Not large but cute.
ABOVE: The sun porch. The image cannot convey how large and long the porch is. Just wonderful. Lacie and Brandon and I all just stood in the porch, a little awestruck, and in unison exclaimed: I love this room!
ABOVE: You can appreciate the scale of the second-floor sun porch.
ABOVE: One of the things I always look for in a house is a full basement. This makes things WAY easier to get to when restoring/renovating a home. I also like the extra space. An important consideration is light. Does the basement have windows? Luckily the basement at 702 West has numerous nice-sized windows. I also like the cut stone. Charles Squires loved cut stone.
Attached to the back of the house is a circa-1950 2-car garage and with a wide hall leading to the house. I am uncertain if I would just lop this off, convert it to a huge family room, or simply repair it As Is.
Sorry I forgot to take images of the bathrooms. There is a half-bath on the first floor, and a full upstairs. A shower is also in the basement.
While I lust after this house I understand what others are seeing: the place looks dated and needs work. I see this as well, but from what Lacie tells me (and every realtor I have ever known), most buyers get bogged down by the negative aspects of an old house and then cannot see the positive aspects.
I also understand that if I were younger, married, with kids, and had a 9-5 job, I, too, would be unable to see how cool this house is. I would just see the work needed, and when would I have the time or energy? So, I would lust after a house in move-in condition. Please. Please!
But…there are a lot of buyers who have grown kids, some time on their hands, some skill, and a little money put away. This lovely house is but $40K. It can be lived in right away, and one could tackle a room at a time. Paint and newly finished floors would alone do wonders.
Oh, the house needs a great exterior color scheme. It could then, once again, really stand-out.